modern.gov app available
View upcoming public committee documents on your iPad,
Android Device or
Blackberry Playbook with the free modern.gov app.
Venue: Council Chamber, Town Hall, Chorley and YouTube
Contact: Matthew Pawlyszyn Email: matthew.pawlyszyn@chorley.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Declarations of Any Interests Members are reminded of their responsibility to declare any pecuniary interest in respect of matters contained in this agenda.
If you have a pecuniary interest you must withdraw from the meeting. Normally you should leave the room before the business starts to be discussed. You do, however, have the same right to speak as a member of the public and may remain in the room to enable you to exercise that right and then leave immediately. In either case you must not seek to improperly influence a decision on the matter. |
|
Minutes of meeting Tuesday, 15 August 2023 of Planning Committee |
|
Planning applications to be determined |
|
20/01378/FULMAJ - Formerly Mormon Church, Water Street, Chorley Additional documents:
Decision: Application deferred to allow Members the opportunity to visit the site. |
|
23/00616/PIP - Whitegates, 75 Gorsey Lane, Mawdesley Additional documents:
Decision: Permission in principle refused for the following reason:
“The proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt and, therefore, harmful by definition.
There would also be other harm as a result of sprawl and encroachment. It is not considered that there are very special circumstances to overcome the definitional harm to the Green Belt and additional harm caused through sprawl and encroachment. The proposal is, therefore, contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework. |
|
23/00445/FUL - Land 150M West Of Oakfields and 197 Runshaw Lane, Euxton Additional documents: Decision: Planning permission refused for the following reason:
The proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt and, therefore, harmful by definition. There would also be other harm to the Green Belt through encroachment into the countryside. It is not considered that there are very special circumstances to overcome the definitional harm to the Green Belt and additional harm from encroachment of the countryside. The proposal is, therefore, contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework. |