Agenda and draft minutes

Overview and Scrutiny Task Group - CCTV Provision - Thursday, 15th May 2014 2.00 pm

modern.gov app available
View upcoming public committee documents on your iPad, Android Device or Blackberry Playbook with the free modern.gov app.

Venue: Committee Room 2, Town Hall, Chorley

Contact: Dianne Scambler  Email: dianneb.scambler@chorley.gov.uk

Items
No. Item

14.CTV.27

Apologies for absence

Minutes:

An apology for absence was received from Councillor Kim Snape.

14.CTV.28

Minutes pdf icon PDF 53 KB

To confirm the minutes of the Overview and Scrutiny Task Group – CCTV Provision meeting held on 8 April 2014 (enclosed)

Minutes:

RESOLVED – That the minutes of the Overview and Scrutiny Task Group – CCTV Provision meeting held on 8 April 2014 be held as a correct record for signing by the Chair.

14.CTV.29

Declarations of Any Interests

Members are reminded of their responsibility to declare any pecuniary interest in respect of matters contained in this agenda.

 

If you have a pecuniary interest you must withdraw from the meeting. Normally you should leave the room before the business starts to be discussed. You do, however, have the same right to speak as a member of the public and may remain in the room to enable you to exercise that right and then leave immediately. In either case you must not seek to improperly influence a decision on the matter.

Minutes:

There were no declarations of interest.

14.CTV.30

CCTV Provision and Infrastructure pdf icon PDF 428 KB

Report of the Director of People and Places (enclosed)

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Group considered a report of the Director of People and Places that presented information on the consultation undertaken with the Parish Councils and the draft final report of the review.

 

The feedback from Parish Council had been supportive of the CCTV service and had provided many examples of anecdotal evidence to support the case for maintaining its presence, although many of the parishes felt the service could be extended to the outlying areas of the borough.

 

The Chair, Councillor Robert Finnamore presented the draft final report of the review, which had been undertaken under Overview and Scrutiny’s requirement to scrutinise crime and disorder matters.

 

Members also raised the public perception of safety provide by CCTV, how far cameras acted as a deterrent, the cameras role in preventing the escalation or crime or the prosecution of offenders including those involved in serious crime.

 

As the subject was a complex one, the Chair of Overview and Scrutiny suggested that a full scrutiny review on the provision of CCTV in Chorley be undertaken to by a Task Group to inform future CCTV provision in the Borough.

 

The task group had engaged with both partners and customers to ensure that all perspectives were considered and to ensure the scrutiny was balanced. The system was highly valued by the community and was an effective tool used in the prevention of crime and disorder.

 

There was significant support for the provision a CCTV service from key partners such as police; from public response to a consultation; from local town centre business and from Parish Council. Therefore the option to decommission the service was not considered acceptable and the Task Group recommended that the provision of the service be continued at some level.

 

The Task Group AGREED to ask the Executive Cabinet is asked to consider the following options:

 

Infrastructure Provision

 

 

Option

 

Detail

 

Cost

 

Advantage/Disadvantages

 

Option 1

 

Do nothing and retain the existing system and seek to maintain it.

 

c. £20K per annum

 

Equipment will become obsolete and not maintainable at reasonable cost

 

Option 2

 

Replace key components to improve the system recording capability

 

c. £28K one off cost

 

Upgraded and digitised recording capacity provided

 

Option 3

 

Option 2 plus replacement of the current desktop operating system utilised to remotely switch camera views and manoeuvre cameras according to monitoring requirements

 

c. £48K one off cost

 

Improved operation and manoeuvrability of cameras

 

Option 4

 

Option 3 plus the wholesale replacement of existing camera heads

 

c. £215K

 

The current suite of 50+ cameras would be replaced with new products and remove the current annual maintenance cost requirement of £20K

 

 

Option 5

 

Option 3 plus phased replacement of existing camera heads

 

c. £48K plus £4K per camera which could total in excess of £250K

 

Higher costs due to no economies of scale and maintenance cost of remaining cameras ongoing. However there is an advantage in terms of ability to consider relocation and addition of cameras in a phased way to meet changing demand.

 

 

In addition the Task Group recommended  ...  view the full minutes text for item 14.CTV.30