modern.gov app available
View upcoming public committee documents on your iPad,
Android Device or
Blackberry Playbook with the free modern.gov app.
Venue: Committee Room, Town Hall, Chorley
Contact: Ruth Hawes 01257 515118
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies for Absence Minutes: Apologies for absence were submitted on behalf of Councillors E Smith, Russell and J Snape. |
|
Declarations of Any Interests Members of the Panel are reminded of their responsibility to declare any personal interest in respect of matters contained in this agenda in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Act 2000, the Council’s Constitution and the Members Code of Conduct. If the personal interest is a prejudicial interest, then the individual Member should not participate in a discussion on the matter and must withdraw from the room and not seek to influence a decision on the matter. Minutes: No interests were declared. |
|
To confirm as a correct record the minutes of the meeting of the Customer Overview and Scrutiny Panel held on 6 July 2005 (enclosed) Minutes: RESOLVED – That minutes of the meeting of the Customer Overview and Scrutiny Panel held on 6 July 2005 be confirmed as a correct record and signed by the Chair. |
|
Report from Director of Clinical Governance Chorley and South Ribble PCT, Sally Fletcher (enclosed) Additional documents: Minutes: The Panel welcomed the Director of Clinical Governance, Sally Fletcher and the Head of Clinical Governance, Glenn Mather from Chorley and South Ribble Primary Care Trust.
Sally Fletcher presented a report entitled “Assessment for Improvement/Standards for Better Health Update and Action Plan”. This was an annual assessment of healthcare organisations set out by the Healthcare Commission. There were seven domains of Standards for Better Health, divided into 24 core and 13 developmental standards.
The Panel noted that comments gathered from partners and a draft declaration would be submitted to the PCT Board meeting in October and that the final declaration would be made in April 2006.
Members considered the report, the Action Plan and the Guidance on the Assessment of Core Standards. In response to a query it was noted that several inspections had already taken place to monitor the implementation and progress made. This included evidence that strategies were being implemented, not just that a strategy was in existence.
The Panel discussed several points raised in the Action Plan, including MRSA and the quality of service versus costs. The benefits of engagement with local partners and Patient and Public Involvement Forums were noted.
RESOLVED –
|
|
One Stop Shop Inquiry Update PDF 147 KB Report of Assistant Head of Customer Services (enclosed) Minutes: The Panel received a report from the Assistant Head of Customer Services reporting the actions taken following the One Stop Shop Inquiry recommendations presented to the Executive Cabinet in June 2004.
In response to a query the Assistant Head of Customer Services advised that meeting was scheduled for late September with the Development Control Manager to discuss the recommendations made in relation to Planning Services.
Members noted that Human Resources were considering the recommendation with regard to training staff to use sign language on a corporate level. A further update would be brought to the Panel on this recommendation.
The Members supported the introduction of weekly surgeries with the Community Development Officer in partnership with Lancashire County Council.
The Chair congratulated all the Officers and Members on the “Excellent” rating in the recent Customer Access and Focus Best Value Inspection. The Council also received and “Excellent” for prospects for improvement. This was a unique result throughout the country.
RESOLVED – That the update report be noted. |
|
Review of Race Equality Scheme PDF 151 KB Report of Head of Corporate and Policy Services (enclosed) Additional documents:
Minutes: The Panel received the report of the Head of Corporate and Policy Services informing Members of progress made by the Council towards the objectives set out in the Corporate Equalities Plan since the update given in July and to inform Members of the recent review of the relevance of council services to race, gender and disability.
The Panel discussed the report and queried several points. It was noted that training sessions for Members would be planned in September and October. A letter had been sent to all Members as part of the consultation process. Other groups being consulted were the Local Strategic Partnership and community groups.
RESOLVED –
|
|
Decriminalisation of Parking Enforcement Inquiry - Collecting Evidence Minutes: The Panel considered the following items as part of the collecting evidence stage of the ongoing Decriminalisation of Parking Enforcement Inquiry. |
|
To discuss financial matters with the Accountant for DPE from Finance Unit Minutes: This item was deferred to the next meeting with the consent of the Chair. |
|
To receive the report of the Sub-Groups held on 9 August 2005 and 17 August 2005 PDF 53 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Panel considered the minutes of the two Sub-Groups held on 9 August and 17 August 2005.
The issue of Disabled Badge holders incorrectly displaying their badges was considered. This could be a security issue as if the photograph side of the badge was displayed it highlighted the fact that the person was not a home and therefore could be at risk from burglary. It was noted that there were instances of abuse of the Disabled Badges.
The Panel discussed drivers who parked in a selfish way, for example parking across two spaces. The number of these instances had reduced since the introduction of DPE.
Members noted that the number of PCN’s/Car Park tickets sold was less than 1% from September 2004 and June 2005. The perception of the public that a larger number of people receiving PCN’s than was actually the case needed to be addressed.
RESOLVED –
|
|
To consider the report Penalty Charge Notice Processing – An Overview PDF 47 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The Panel received the report of the Parking Manager outlining the procedure for the processing of PCN’s and the representation/adjudication process. A standard letter sent out when an appeal was successful was noted.
In response to a query the Members noted that the rate of debt recovery in other Local Authorities was around 70%.
RESOLVED – That the report be noted. |
|
Additional documents: Minutes: The Panel considered the articles “Wake up call for enforcers” and “Time to listen to some advice” regarding the recent Childs report and University of Birmingham research.
The Panel noted that a number of recommendations had been made geared towards changing the negative public perception of DPE. This perception was a national issue.
RESOLVED – That the articles be noted. |
|
To consider Information relating to drivers with disabled badges PDF 579 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Panel considered the Blue Booklet given to drivers who received a disabled badge and a letter sent to a driver explaining why a PCN had been issued.
RESOLVED – That the information be noted. |
|
To receive an example of a Penalty Charge Notice PDF 77 KB Minutes: An example of a PCN was presented. The reason for the ticket to be issued, the penalty to be paid, instructions for payment and contact details for any queries were noted. The PA took a picture of the Pay and Display machine and the PCN placed on the vehicle in each instance.
RESOLVED – That the example of a PCN be noted. |
|
To examine Parking Attendant beat information Minutes: The Panel viewed the beat information for the Parking Attendants and noted that the Flat Iron Car Park appeared on two beats. In response to a query the Members were advised that if there were two PA’s completing a beat together the second person would probably be either a supervisor or a PA receiving on the job training.
RESOLVED – That the report be noted. |
|
To arrange dates and location for the proposed site visit Minutes: Members discussed a venue for a site visit and noted that it was difficult to find a comparative authority to Chorley as other authorities with DPE were County or Unitary authorities. The Members expressed a wish to meet with the officers involved and if possible the Executive Member.
The Panel expressed a wish to visit an authority that had been operating DPE for a number of years to gain the benefits of their experience and any lessons learnt.
RESOLVED – That a site visit be held in October and that the questions to be asked at the site visit be considered at the Panel meeting in October. |
|
To arrange dates and times for Councillors to visit the Parking Manager and view the computer system Minutes: This item was deferred to the next meeting with the consent of the Chair. |
|
To examine publicity information for the public Minutes: Members considered draft leaflets entitled “Pavements are for People” and “Safer parking with your disabled badge”. These would be used in certain situations were a driver had parked in an inconsiderate manner. It was noted that a Traffic Regulation Order needed to be in place for the PA to dispense a PCN.
The leaflets would be presented to the Disability Liaison Group and should be printed soon.
RESOLVED – That the leaflets be noted and supported. |
|
To consider questions for the questionannire to seek the views of the public, Councillors and Parish Councillors Minutes: A questionnaire would be undertaken on behalf of the Panel, the questions to be asked were discussed:
RESOLVED – That the draft questions be sent to the company compiling the questionnaire. |
|
Overview and Scrutiny Work Programme PDF 89 KB Work programme enclosed. Minutes: RESOLVED - That the Work Programme be noted. |
|
Any other item(s) that the Chair decides is/are urgent Minutes: With the consent of the Chair a Member of the Public who had attended the meeting discussed an incident of inconsiderate parking with the Panel. |