Use the below search options at the bottom of the page to find information regarding recent decisions that have been taken by the council’s decision making bodies.
Decision Maker: Executive Member (Economic Development and Public Service Reform)
Decision published: 05/05/2021
Effective from: 13/05/2021
Decision:
Decision:
Recommendation(s) approved.
Reasons for Recommendation(s): |
A prestigious conference held at Astley Hall and Coach House is likely to bring national attention to Chorley, supporting the council’s ambitions to promote tourism and economic growth. |
Alternative options considered and rejected |
1. To not compensate the effected tenants for the disruption to access to their business, but this was rejected as the council would be in breach of its lease. 2. To not facilitate the conference being held at Astley, which was rejected as it would miss the opportunity to raise Chorley’s profile, and the associated economic benefits.
|
Lead officer: Chris Sinnott
Decision Maker: Executive Member (Resources)
Decision published: 04/05/2021
Effective from: 12/05/2021
Decision:
Decision:
That the terms agreed be approved and authority granted for the Lease to be completed.
Reasons for Recommendation(s): |
To meet the need for the provision of allotments prominently in the parish of Euxton.
|
Alternative Options Considered and Rejected: |
None
|
Lead officer: Catherine Jagger
Decision Maker: Executive Member (Resources)
Decision published: 30/04/2021
Effective from: 30/04/2021
Decision:
Decision:
Recommendations approved.
Reasons for Recommendation(s): |
1. Potential cost saving across the portfolio of £2.5 million over the term of the Contract.
|
Alternative Options Considered and Rejected |
2. None
|
Lead officer: David Taylor
Decision Maker: Executive Member (Homes and Housing)
Decision published: 30/04/2021
Effective from: 08/05/2021
Decision:
Decision:
Recommendations approved.
Reasons for Recommendation(s): |
1. A local lettings policy is required to ensure the bungalows in CBC ownership are allocated in a fair and transparent manner. |
Alternative options considered and rejected |
1. To use the existing Select Move policy to allocate the bungalows to general need and not to develop a separate locally lettings policy. This was rejected as the purpose of the council buying bungalows was as a step-down accommodation for over 55’s to free up larger family accommodation.
|
Lead officer: Lorraine McIntyre
Decision Maker: Planning Committee
Made at meeting: 27/04/2021 - Planning Committee
Decision published: 29/04/2021
Effective from: 27/04/2021
Decision:
Planning permission granted, subject to conditions.
Decision Maker: Planning Committee
Made at meeting: 27/04/2021 - Planning Committee
Decision published: 29/04/2021
Effective from: 27/04/2021
Decision:
Outline planning permission granted, subject to conditions and a S106 agreement.
Decision Maker: Planning Committee
Made at meeting: 27/04/2021 - Planning Committee
Decision published: 29/04/2021
Effective from: 27/04/2021
Decision:
Decision deferred to allow Members of the Planning Committee the opportunity to visit the site of the proposals.
Decision Maker: Planning Committee
Made at meeting: 27/04/2021 - Planning Committee
Decision published: 29/04/2021
Effective from: 27/04/2021
Decision:
Planning permission granted, subject to conditions.
Decision Maker: Planning Committee
Made at meeting: 27/04/2021 - Planning Committee
Decision published: 29/04/2021
Effective from: 27/04/2021
Decision:
Full planning permission granted, subject to conditions.
Decision Maker: Planning Committee
Made at meeting: 27/04/2021 - Planning Committee
Decision published: 29/04/2021
Effective from: 27/04/2021
Decision:
Full planning permission granted, subject to conditions.
Decision Maker: Planning Committee
Made at meeting: 27/04/2021 - Planning Committee
Decision published: 29/04/2021
Effective from: 27/04/2021
Decision:
That the order be confirmed with modification.
Lead officer: Matthew Simpson
Decision Maker: Planning Committee
Made at meeting: 27/04/2021 - Planning Committee
Decision published: 29/04/2021
Effective from: 27/04/2021
Decision:
As it was the last planning meeting of the municipal year before the all-out local elections in May, the Chair thanked Members of the committee for adapting to virtual and hybrid planning meetings over the last year during Covid-19.
Special thanks were given to Councillor Chris France, as Vice-Chair of the Planning Committee, for all his help and support over the years.
The Chair extended her best wishes to all members for the future.
Decision Maker: Executive Member (Resources)
Decision published: 29/04/2021
Effective from: 07/05/2021
Decision:
Decision:
Recommendations approved.
Reasons for Recommendation(s): |
1. The proposed tenant is regarded as an important tenant /trader within the Centre.
|
Alternative options considered and rejected |
2. The tenant issued proceedings and the Council has already confirmed in the Acknowledgement of Service that the grant of a new tenancy was not opposed, only on the proposed terms therefore the matter is now in the Court’s hands and if we do not reach agreement on terms the Court will make an Order on its own accord.
|
Lead officer: Michael Forster, Catherine Jagger
Decision Maker: Executive Member (Customer, Streetscene and Environment)
Decision published: 29/04/2021
Effective from: 07/05/2021
Decision:
Decision:
Recommendations approved.
Reasons for the recommendation(s): |
1. Approval of the recommendations will enable the ICT service to develop into a shared service with a single operating model, as previously agreed by both councils. This includes the introduction of shared service management to lead the shared vision and direction of ICT, and a service development outline to transform and align the service within a single operating model.
2. Implementing the review in a staged approach reflects feedback collected through staff engagement in the informal consultation for the review and will allow greater 1:1 support and consideration to be made for the whole service restructure. |
Alternative options considered and rejected |
1. Alternative options for the ICT review have been considered within the service review report.
|
Lead officer: Asim Khan, Caroline Winstanley
Decision Maker: Executive Member (Resources)
Decision published: 29/04/2021
Effective from: 07/05/2021
Decision:
Decision:
Recommendations approved.
Reasons for the recommendation(s):
To generate revenue and support economic growth in Chorley. |
Alternative options considered and rejected |
None
|
Lead officer: Catherine Jagger
Decision Maker: Executive Member (Resources)
Decision published: 29/04/2021
Effective from: 07/05/2021
Decision:
Decision:
Recommendations approved.
Reasons for the recommendation(s): |
1. The proposal to reimburse the employee follows Treasury guidance relating to employees affected by the payments cap that was implemented within The Restriction of Public Sector Exit Payments Regulations 2020, which have now been revoked. 2. This also ensures that the individual concerned receives their contractual entitlement. |
Alternative options considered and rejected |
1. Not paying the compensation, which could be challenged as a breach of contract for which there is no longer legislative protection.
|
Lead officer: Graeme Walmsley